Post #17: Reflection on the Course

26 04 2010
At the beginning of this class, I was not sure what to expect. While I had received numerous ominous emails about the difficulty of the class, this contradicted about what I had heard about the class. On the first day of class, I felt that the class schedule was a lot to track in my schedule. I also felt that choosing a topic within the first week seemed unreasonable. I didn’t know what to choose; I could have performed a very technical and esoteric study or a very creative one. However, I knew that I wanted to do something where little research existed within the field.
The course became very difficult and stressful when I wrote the introduction and literature review because I had yet to change my topic to its current state. After performing close-reading, I decided that I definitely wanted to change my topic, and the close reading showed me the importance of fully reading the articles instead of reading only certain sections. I was worried at this point that I would not be able to keep up while performing regular blog assignments. This indeed was true and the fact that Marlen performed a random blog check on the one day I was not able to keep up made me consider dropping the class. However, I did not drop the class and instead performed well until I was about to launch the survey. Around this time, the class became a hassle, as I would consistently become demotivated after undirected anger in the class was released, which I interpreted as directed towards myself, even though I knew it was not the case. Hence, I was not able to launch the survey until some classes were canceled and I was not demotivated. Once I collected the data, I felt much better; this was my proudest moment in the class and was a great sigh of relief. The data analysis was the most fun part, and confirmed some of my hypotheses and research I had read.
One way I turned my worries and anxieties into strength was by being very thorough in grooming the research, even after I had changed my topic. I am somewhat of a perfectionist and did not want to turn in an assignment without performing adequate and correct research on the topic.
My future goal as a writer is to use the skills I learned in this class and apply it to my career in IT design and development. I know that I will have to creatively make presentations combining artistry, technical specifications, and good style and convention to businesses. While I may not have to write a full research paper, I will certainly have to perform studies and analysis such as the one I conducted. In addition, I will have to communicate to those higher in the chain of command the best options and the backing reasoning. I feel as if I already had the work ethic and time-management skills before the class, but the class reminded me that they will always need to be utilized.
Finally, the thing that will ‘stick with me’ for the longest amount of time after this class is the sense of community that the class fashioned. You could always walk into class and exchange in free discussion of everyone’s topic and receive constructive feedback about your plans. I liked how the ‘groups’ worked in the class, even if they were not utilized much towards the end of the semester. While most groupwork causes a disproportionate amount of work to fall on one or two members, the way groups were utilized in this class fostered individualism and worked well with the subject material. In the future, if I get a project management position in IT, I will remember this type of unit and use it appropriately within the organization, as it would be beneficial.




Blog #16: Reflection on Writing a Research Paper

26 04 2010
During the completion of my research paper, I learned a great deal about formatting, style, conventions, and most importantly, integration of sources.  I began the project with a very rigid research question of determining how the internet has affected friendships.  I continually revised this question until I reached the question of  “how has social networking affected closeness of friendships?”  However, I felt that this topic had already been discussed in depth and was known among the general population in a subconscious manner.  Therefore, I modified my topic to a new, very narrow, and largely uncharted topic.  This of course, is the current research question I proposed: “What are the sociological motivations behind Facebook creeping?”  I found that I instantly enjoyed this topic more, because I felt as if I was performing meaningful research.  Furthermore, almost no research had been performed on the behavior in question, even though many in college are well aware of its presence and consequences.  Having a background in web development and social networking development gave me the inspiration to research the topic even though little direct research had been performed.  In fact, only one researcher had actually created a scientific name for the phenomenon, which I utilized throughout my paper.
As far as the research process, I did not find it to be as daunting as one would believe.  My previous research questions gave me a lot of background as to privacy violation and online friendship, and I used two of these studies in my final draft.  However, it was fairly difficult to separate relevant information from the older articles to apply them to the new topic. I did not encounter many problems until the final stages, after I had received all of the survey responses.  I had to creatively separate some of the responses in a manner consistent with current research in order to even consider three of my hypotheses.  From there, I also found the analysis difficult; I spent around 2.5 days on-and-off analyzing the data in around 25 Excel spreadsheets.  However, with the surprising results, it was well worth it.
I received little feedback about the paper from others before getting into the methodology section. I received help from friends in making sure the survey questions made sense to those not studying the topic. Despite the peer reviews, this help was the most useful feedback I received during the research assignment because it provided consolation that the survey would actually be able to find correlations. In addition, discussing others’ research and thinking about it in comparison to my own topics was also a great help.
The assignment which was the most useful to me during the research process was the close reading of two journal articles. This made me really consider if I wanted to stick with my current topic. Until this point, I had not fully read a journal article; I had only considered certain sections. I would later re-read in full all of the journals I had utilized, which helped me find my new topic and discover the Tufekci study.
The most difficult part of the drafting process was integrating sources from the literature review due to my change in topic. After close reading, I found that I had to eliminate some of the references and incorporate others. Consequentially, this took a large portion of my time. The easiest part of the drafting process was style and word choice. Everyone that has read the paper so far has said it sounds very professional, but I had no difficult in choosing professional language after becoming familiar with the jargon used in previous studies.
While I have written research papers before, I have never written one at the professional level. I would hope that the final essay shows the vast amount of research, time, and effort I put into the paper during the last semester. In addition, I hope that it shows my evolution as a writer as far as style and reader captivation.




Abstract Draft #1

22 04 2010

Facebook has become the most popular social networking website in the US, raising public awareness of social networking through its vast market penetration.  A variety of new social situations have arisen due to the rise of social media and networking.  One phenomenon commonly called “Facebook creeping”, or more scientifically, “peer monitoring”  has entered the realm of young adults, especially college students in the past two years.  This study attempted to discover the sociological motivations behind peer monitoring.  31 students at Indiana University of Pennsylvania were surveyed as to their attitudes and behaviors regarding “creeping”.  The study found a probable third person effect regarding privacy violation between the self and others, confirming other studies.  The study probed differences between extroverts and introverts regarding self-modeling and their motivations for popularity, finding that introverts were more likely to contradict themselves about peer monitoring behavior due to self-modeling.  In addition, users found that attractiveness of peers was a major factor in acceptability of peer monitoring directed to themselves.





Post #15: Experience from Peer Reviews

20 04 2010
I received both of my peer evaluations back recently (although before I included the results), and this was very beneficial to my writing process. The comments and rubric helped me locate specific things I needed to focus upon. I found that the things I had to focus on the most were making the paper sound less ‘stiff’ and using proper APA formatting. Both peer editors told me that the paper was very professional, but some of the language was hard to understand or overly proper. Therefore, I explained a few definitions such as “social capital accumulation” and “third person effect” which may not be immediately apparent to readers in a general audience or even a sociology or communications media department. I am in the process of currently formatting the paper and using section headers and a proper reference page. I realize now that I should have annotated the notes on results, discussion, and conclusion earlier because I will now have to move a substantial amount of my conclusion to the discussion section. The addition of proper APA formatting also means that I will have to use subheadings in the methods section to cover participants and survey methodology.

I enjoyed reading the two papers which I received, as they both related to sociology. I corrected grammatical errors, because I feel that it would be better to correct these sooner in the writing process than later. I found the most useful strategy for me when grading for content was to first read through the paper without making any corrections or notes, and then reading it a second or third time and making notes in formatting, conventions, flow, logical order, and so forth.




Post #14: Results, Discussion, and Conclusion

20 04 2010
The first article on the results section of a research paper is by the language center at the Asian Institute of Technology. The article suggested various tips and recommendations on what to include in the results section of a research paper. Here are a few of the tips which were offered:

  • The data should be presented using an easy-to-follow format, utilizing graphics when appropriate.
  • Any graphs or figures should have a caption explaining the significance.
  • Point out certain important trends rather than include statistics with no accompanying explanation.
  • There are two different ways to write the results section – write the results and then the discussion, or have discussion accompany sections of the results.
  • Some raw data may be better suited for the appendix.

The second article I found on writing the results section suggested many of the same techniques and principles. For example:

  • Provide context to the results such as which question the data in answering.
  • Do not interpret the results; save this for the discussion section.
  • Do not repeat data, put any raw data into an appendix.
  • Refer to figures by number and label them.
  • Either include tables in the results section on as an appendix.

The next section in a research paper is the discussion section, where the data should be analyzed, the significance explained, and provide an explanation of any errors in testing or unforeseen problems. The first source I viewed gave the following information about the discussions section:

  • If the findings support the hypothesis, explain the background behind why the theory is correct. If the findings are contrary to the hypothesis, explain why it is possible to find a contradictory response.
  • Explain if the findings agree with others who have performed similar research.
  • Explain what types of experiments would be proper for further study.
  • Do not introduce new results in the discussion.

The second source is the same source used in the results section, as it gives formatting recommendations for all parts of a research paper. Some of the recommendations from this source are:

  • Support or reject a hypothesis or declare a hypothesis indeterminate if there is not enough data. Do not say a result is “inconclusive.”
  • Suggest future research as recommendation for future study.
  • Explain if the designed experiment was controlled sufficiently and if there were any problems.

The final section, the conclusion, should summarize the main ideas of the research and solidify the significance of the research to the reader. Some tips provided by my first source include:

  • Play the “So what?” game: provide a dialogue which forces you to explain the significance of the research to a partner.
  • Return to themes present in the introduction
  • Do not use phrases such as “in conclusion”, “in summary” or “in closing”.
  • Do not introduce new topics in the conclusion.
  • Avoid emotional appeals.

The second source provides the following tips on writing a conclusion:

  • Restate the main ideas of the research in a very concise manner.
  • The conclusion should be short. Do not repeat long sections of the paper.
  • Use “signpost words” to help the reader transition into the conclusion. (ex. “next”, “finally”)
  • The final sentence should bring the reader to a mental conclusion. Possibilities include a brief anecdote, an appropriate quotation, a humorous statement, a simile, or a brief statement about future research.
References

Caprette, David R.(2007, August 20). How to write a research paper. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/report/reportform.html

Department of Biology, Bates College. (2008, September 25). How to Write Guide: Sections of the Paper. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/writing/HTWsections.html

Language Center, Asian Institute of Technology (2003). Writing up Research: Results. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://www.languages.ait.ac.th/EL21RES.HTM

Rockler-Gladen, Naomi. (2008, November 17). How to write a College Term Paper Conclusion: Effective Tips for Ending an Essay.. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://studyskills.suite101.com/article.cfm/how_to_write_a_college_term_paper_conclusion

UNC Writing Center. (2010, February 11). Conclusions. Retrieved April 20, 2010 from http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/conclusions.html








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.