Unknown’s Review – The blind peer review was the most helpful review. I had had previous reviewers mention correct formatting, but they pointed out specific examples on the reference page which needed to be corrected. I received the following feedback:
- Great topic. Facebook is a hot topic.
- Intro. is strong.
- Watch in-text citation format.
- Don’t start sentences with numbers.
- Methods section is good.
- You stated your results clearly and with graphs.
John’s Review – John gave me a lot of advice about referencing specific information I used in my paper. He also wanted me to provide more graphs, but I felt that data was very simple and didn’t need charts or graphs. Some specific feedback I received:
- Good flow
- Outstanding Lit. Review
- Needs better formatting.
- Needs appropriate citations.
- Your results and the graph was excellent.
- Discussion is excellent.
Sarah’s Review: Sarah gave me a lot of advice about stylizing my paper for a more general audience. Specific feedback I received includes:
- Paper sounds professional.
- Paper flowed well.
- Need to look at citing again.
- Need to re-do references
Heather’s Review: Heather gave me similar advice to Sarah about simplifying the paper to a more general audience. She also helped take my survey. Some of the feedback I received included:
- Your information is varied and interesting.
- I was not bored at all while reading.
- Some of the vocab. was difficult to figure out.
- Your methods section switches from past to present tense.
- Your survey was well-written and thought-out.
- You made valid points in your intro.
